Skip to content
Fitness News You Can Trust

Genetic Modification of American Meat: A Breakdown of the Process

Approval granted by FDA for gene-altered pigs, resistant to diseases, now fit for market and consumption. But the question arises: is society prepared for CRISPR-infused bacon?

,   and  Administrator
3 min read
Genetically modified meat from the United States may be on the horizon, shedding light on the...
Genetically modified meat from the United States may be on the horizon, shedding light on the implications of such alterations.

Genetic Modification of American Meat: A Breakdown of the Process

Gene-Edited PRRS-Resistant Pigs Set to Hit U.S. Markets

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has given the green light to a groundbreaking innovation in pig farming – the farming of genetically enhanced pigs resistant to the deadly Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS). These pigs, engineered using the CRISPR toolkit, are expected to be available for consumption from 2026.

PRRS is a virus that causes severe health problems in pigs, resulting in immune system damage and reproductive failures. The disease has been responsible for significant economic losses for the pork industry, with an estimated $1.2 billion lost annually in the U.S. alone [1][5].

Safety and Health

The FDA's approval of these gene-edited pigs indicates a confidence in their safety for consumers and animal health. However, concerns have been raised by some producers about the long-term risks associated with these edits, particularly regarding animal welfare and consumer safety [1][3].

The gene edits are introduced early in the development of the pigs, and they are bred conventionally thereafter [5]. The changes in the genetically enhanced pigs are minimal, primarily affecting a small section of pig DNA related to the CD163 protein.

Ethical Considerations

Supporters of the gene-edited pigs argue that they reduce animal suffering by improving resistance to a deadly disease and lowering the need for antibiotics and vaccines, thus promoting animal welfare and sustainability [1][5].

However, opponents, including organic pork producers, question the ethical implications of modifying animal genomes and raise concerns about potential unintended consequences [1][3]. They advocate for transparent and mandatory labeling to allow consumer choice based on ethical preferences.

The technology also raises broader questions about genetic changes in livestock without extensive, long-term validation. However, rigorous validation of the edited genes is considered crucial [4].

Looking Ahead

The first widely consumed gene-edited animals are expected to be PRRS-resistant pigs. This development could significantly reduce disease-related suffering and economic losses. However, it also opens up a debate about the ethical implications of gene editing, consumer rights for transparency, and the need for thorough long-term risk assessments.

It's important to note that there is no effective vaccine for PRRS. The gene-editing toolkit used is CRISPR, a Nobel Prize-winning technology. While gene-edited foods can't be sold in the EU, the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act provides a basis for breeding of gene-edited food in England.

Dr Katie Sanders, a food systems communication specialist, notes that there is greater potential for consumer acceptance of gene-edited foods compared to traditionally genetically modified foods [2]. As the world grapples with the ethical, safety, and sustainability implications of gene editing, it's clear that responsible governance and clear labeling will be crucial to address consumer concerns.

References:

[1] https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/newsevents/cvmupdates/ucm818521.htm

[2] https://www.fda.gov/media/143866/download

[3] https://www.genusplc.com/media/2423/genus-statement-on-fda-approval-of-gene-edited-pigs.pdf

[4] https://www.genusplc.com/media/2427/genus-responds-to-fda-approval-of-gene-edited-pigs.pdf

[5] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004219300938

  1. The introduction of gene-edited pigs resistant to PRRS, utilizing the CRISPR toolkit, is a significant advancement in the field of science and technology, especially in agriculture.
  2. The FDA's approval of these gene-edited pigs is a testament to the safety and health benefits they offer, reducing economic losses and promoting animal welfare.
  3. However, concerns about long-term risks, ethical implications, and potential unintended consequences have been raised, leading to a debate regarding transparent labeling and thorough long-term risk assessments.
  4. Proponents of the gene-edited pigs argue that they reduce animal suffering, promote sustainability, and could pave the way for future advancements in medical-conditions treatment, as the technology behind it, CRISPR, is a Nobel Prize-winning tool.
  5. Looking ahead, the challenge lies in balancing the benefits of genetic editing with ethical considerations, ensuring the health and wellness of both animals and consumers, and addressing concerns related to environmental impact and engineering.
  6. In the realm of health and wellness, gene-editing technology has vast potential, from alleviating health-related issues in pigs to providing solutions for other medical-conditions, enhancing the future of both human and animal health.

Read also:

    Related

    Latest