Is it more effective to have an organ donation system that requires explicit consent (opt-in) or one that assumes consent unless explicitly declined (opt-out)?

Is it more effective to have an organ donation system that requires explicit consent (opt-in) or one that assumes consent unless explicitly declined (opt-out)?

Choosing Sides: Opt-In vs Opt-Out Organ Donation

Across the globe, oxygenating a bitter divide: organ donation policies. But which side of the fence is greener? A team of researchers from the UK, led by Prof. Eamonn Ferguson of the University of Nottingham, embarked on a mission to investigate the efficacy of opt-in and opt-out systems, analyzing the organ donation protocols of 48 countries.

In opt-in systems, people must actively sign up to a registry, pledging their organs posthumously. On the other hand, opt-out systems surreptitiously assume consent, with individuals required to explicitly opt-out before death to forbid organ donation.

Prof. Ferguson acknowledges that both systems rely on the individual's decision, often resulting in drawbacks such as loss aversion, lack of effort, and a belief that authorities have made the right call.

However, the catch lies within. A failure to act in an opt-in system might lead to individuals yearning to donate yet failing to do so (a false negative). Conversely, inaction in an opt-out system could potentially solicit an individual who abhors the idea of donating (a false positive).

The United States employs an opt-in system, facilitating 28,000 transplants last year. Regrettably, around 18 individuals succumb daily, denied life due to a scarcity of donated organs.

To Sign or Not to Sign?

The scholars from Nottingham, Stirling, and Northumbria pored over the organ donation systems of 48 countries over 13 years, dividing them into 23 opt-in and 25 opt-out countries.

The study's authors tracked donor numbers, transplant numbers per organ, and the total number of kidneys and livers transplanted from both deceased and living donors. Their findings reveal that countries employing opt-out systems experience higher total numbers of kidneys donated - the organ most sought by patients on the organ transplant list. Additionally, these systems record a greater overall number of organ transplants.

Opt-in systems, on the other hand, boast a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors. This influence on living donation rates, Prof. Ferguson explains, is a subtlety that merits attention.

The authors concede that their study has limitations, as it does not discern varying degrees of opt-out legislation, with some countries necessitating permission from next-of-kin. Moreover, the observational nature of the study means that other factors influencing organ donation were left unevaluated.

Moving On

The researchers report that their findings, published in BMC Medicine, reveal that opt-out consent increases deceased donation while reducing living donation rates. Furthermore, it is linked to an escalation in the total number of livers and kidneys transplanted.

They suggest that these results might be utilized to inform policy decisions in the future. However, they could be bolstered by the collection and public dissemination of international organ donation information – consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability, to name a few.

Prof. Ferguson proposes future studies that delve into individual beliefs, desires, and attitudes, employing a mix of surveys and experimental methods to garner a deeper understanding of how consent legislation influences organ donation and transplantation rates.

The authors acknowledge that countries using opt-out consent still suffer donor shortages. A complete system overhaul is unlikely to alleviate this issue; they propose that enhancing consent legislation or adopting components of the "Spanish Model" could bolster donor rates.

Spain boasts the highest organ donation rate globally. Experts attribute their success to a transplant coordination network that seamlessly operates both regionally and nationally, as well as improving the quality and accessibility of public information regarding organ donation.

A current spotlight feature on Medical News Today wrestles with whether farm-raised animal organs should be utilized for human transplants – a potential solution to the donor shortage or an issue to be addressed through changes to organ donation policy? The answer remains elusive.

1. In the study published in BMC Medicine, the researchers found that opt-out consent systems, in contrast to opt-in systems, lead to an increase in deceased organ donations and a reduction in living organ donations.
2. Opt-out consent systems are associated with a higher number of kidney transplants overall and more total organ transplants, while opt-in systems have a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors.
3. Ferguson suggests future research focusing on individual beliefs, desires, and attitudes towards organ donation to better understand how consent legislation influences organ donation and transplantation rates.
4. The authors of the study propose that enhancing organ donation legislation or adopting components of the "Spanish Model," which features a transplant coordination network and improved public information, could potentially boost donor rates to alleviate the donor shortage.

Read also: