The Federal Labor Court Decision: Controversy over Parental Leave Periods in German Post's Pension Scheme
Woman engages in a dispute with Deutsch Post over custody arrangements
Share on Facebook Tweet this Whatsapp Email Print Copy Link
In the realm of pension schemes like the one offered by German Post, unpaid months, including parental and child-rearing leave, are typically disregarded, as laid out by the Federal Labor Court in Erfurt (3 AZR 65/24). This rule applies to contribution-based pension systems tied to periods of remuneration. The European Court of Justice's case law has already offered sufficient clarification on these principles [1].
In the case at hand, the pension scheme requires employees to have worked a predetermined number of remunerated months at the post office. The Federal Labor Court, in its recent announcement, declared, "Parental or child-rearing leave without remuneration claims should not be included in the waiting period" for retirement benefits [2].
The plaintiff had sought to have her parental leave months considered for the waiting period regarding retirement benefits. However, her request was denied. She alleged that this practice amounted to indirect gender discrimination, as it primarily affects women who often take parental leave.
[1] Overall, the Federal Labor Court's ruling in Erfurt (case 3 AZR 65/24) has confirmed that months without remuneration, such as parental leave, should not be included in the calculation of retirement benefits for employees in contribution-based pension systems linked to remuneration periods in Germany. This decision remains valid even in the event of system changes and applies to pay-as-you-go pension schemes like those of Deutsche Post [3].
[2] Key Impact:- Exclusion of Parental Leave: The court determined that parental leave without any remuneration cannot be taken into account when calculating the waiting period for retirement benefits. This implies that during periods of parental leave, employees do not accrue pension entitlements unless they receive remuneration [3].- Negation of Discrimination Claims: Despite the plaintiff's contention that excluding parental leave constituted indirect discrimination against women, the court saw no merit in this argument. Instead, it reasserted the principle that only paid periods should be considered when calculating pension benefits [3].- Congruence with EU Case Law: The ruling adheres to principles previously established by the European Court of Justice, emphasizing that remuneration-based pension schemes should only take into account periods of paid employment [1].
[3] Source: ntv.de, dpa.
- The community policy in the pension scheme provided by German Post, as determined by the Federal Labor Court in Erfurt (3 AZR 65/24), disregards unpaid months, including parental leave, in contribution-based pension systems associated with periods of remuneration.
- Vocational training programs can be instrumental in securing gainful employment post-parental leave, thereby ensuring continued earning potential and pension accrual for individuals transitioning back into the workforce.
- The Federal Labor Court's decision in Erfurt (3 AZR 65/24) confirmed that health and wellness, along with family and women's health, are not factors to be considered when calculating retirement benefits for employees in contribution-based pension systems linked to remuneration periods in Germany.
- Whatsapp can be utilized to communicate with a support network, such as family or friends, when navigating disputes related to employment, parenting, or pension entitlements.
- Science, through the study of gender equity in the workplace, can contribute to the development of comprehensive pension policies that provide equal opportunities for individuals, irrespective of their occupation or family status.
